California - School Site Council Information

 

SBM mandated, recommended, or voluntary: Voluntary. Adopted district model may apply to as few as one school in the district. A school district, however, is “eligible to participate only upon the approval of participation by both the governing board of the district and the exclusive representative of certificated employees of the district.”

 

Statewide or pilot: Statewide

 

Responsibilities/level of authority: Districts may implement “alternative models of school-based management projects, or advanced career opportunities for classroom teachers projects, or a combination of both[.]” “Further, it is the intent of the Legislature that school district governing boards and administrators work with classroom teachers and teacher bargaining units to develop and strengthen procedures that increase teachers’ decisionmaking authority in responsibilities that affect their ability to teach. These procedures may include, but need not be limited to, the following:

 

(1)   Selection of new teachers and administrators

(2)   Evaluation of teacher and administrator performance

(3)   Selection of curricular areas for improvement

(4)   Tailoring and coordination of curriculum and instruction across grade levels and within departments at the schoolsite level

(5)   Establishment of pupil discipline policies

(6)   Design and conduct of staff development programs and policies

(7)   Assignment of pupils and scheduling of classes

(8)   Schoolwide problem solving and program development

(9)   Organization of the school for effective instruction

(10) Development of procedures designed to institutionalize teacher involvement in decisionmaking

(11) Determining the roles and functions of teachers, administrators, and classified employees at the school site

(12) Development of alternative methods of teacher compensation

(13) Establishment of policies … providing schoolsite administrators and teachers with greater budget authority, including the allocation of fiscal, personnel, and other resources at the schoolsite.”

 

District SBM plans must include (a) A plan to include parents in design, implementation and evaluation of school restructuring activity. “(b) A plan for staff development … to assist in restructuring elements specified in the district proposal. (c) A plan for regularly assessing the progress of participating schools in meeting the goals identified in their funding proposal…. Districts are encouraged, as well, to establish a process of onsite quality reviews with the objective of evaluating the quality of instruction, leadership, staff development, and the planning and decisionmaking processes at participating schools.”

 

State board may, upon request of a local board, waive portions of education statutory requirements for an entire district, or for an individual school or programs therein. Certain specified statutes cannot be waived.

 

Composition of council, if mandated: Not mandated

 

Training/technical support addressed in legislation: No

 

Notes: Cal. Educ. Code § 44666 and 44667 set forth the legislative intent for establishing site-based decision-making in the state.

 

Legal citations: CAL. EDUC. CODE § 44666, 44667, 44667.2, 44669, 52049.1

 

 

 

 

 

EDUCATION CODE

SECTION 44666-44669

 
 
 
 
 
44666.  (a) The Legislature finds that a primary goal of every
public school should be the creation of effective and productive
learning environments for pupils.  Increasing the educational
effectiveness and productivity of public schools may require new ways
of organizing instructional and adminstrative staff which increase
the collective investment of all schoolsite educators in the success
of their school.  The Legislature also finds that innovation and
change are frequently discouraged by undue administrative and
organizational rigidity.  The Legislature intends that the school
district's role in working with schoolsites be characterized by
setting clear goals, providing sites the flexibility to achieve those
goals, offering high quality technical assistance and support, and
holding sites accountable for performance.  The Legislature supports
shifting from a rule-based system to a performance-based system of
accountability.  Those educators closest to pupils should be free,
within limits, to create learning environments appropriate to their
circumstances.  The Legislature declares its intent not to diminish
the leadership roles of school districts and site-level
administrators.  However, the Legislature does intend to encourage
schools to foster more professional collaboration where teachers and
principals, as an educational team, are responsible for creating the
conditions that make more effective teaching and learning possible,
and where schoolsite educators as a group have responsibility for the
functioning and performance of their school.
   It is the further intent of the Legislature to encourage and
foster a shift in public school administration from a system that
rigidly controls and directs what goes on at the next lowest level,
to a system that guides and facilitates professionals in their quest
for more productive learning opportunities for their pupils.
   (b) The Legislature further finds and declares all of the
following:
   (1) Hierarchical decisionmaking has tended to reduce the
effectiveness and productivity of teachers in educating pupils.  A
more collaborative decisionmaking process may result in more
effective teaching and pupil learning.
   (2) A true profession should offer individuals the opportunity for
growth in their careers and in their professional lives.
   (3) Professional growth brings with it additional responsibilities
and accountability, and taking greater responsibility allows the
professional to achieve enhanced status and higher salary, and to
make a contribution to the profession.
   (4) The current staffing structures and compensation structures in
California school districts that emphasize seniority in setting
teacher salaries and uniformity in teachers' roles do not adequately
reward teaching excellence, exceptional achievement, or the
assumption of additional educational responsibilities by teachers.
Neither do they provide an incentive for teachers to continue to
pursue excellence.
   (5) The establishment of advanced career opportunities for
teachers, in conjunction with greater teacher involvement in
schoolsite management, should increase the variety and responsibility
of a teacher's work.  It should also provide:  (A) a mechanism for
restructuring salary schedules to recognize experience, additional
work and responsibility; and (B) the opportunity for
performance-based contracts with teachers or groups of teachers.
   (6) Advanced career opportunities for teachers should also provide
an incentive for teachers to remain in teaching, upgrade their
skills, and improve the instructional program.
 
 
 
44667.  (a) It is the intent of the Legislature to encourage school
districts to plan and implement alternative models of school-based
management projects, or advanced career opportunities for classroom
teachers projects, or a combination of both, for one or more schools
in the district.  Further, it is the intent of the Legislature that
school district governing boards and administrators work with
classroom teachers and teacher bargaining units to develop and
strengthen procedures that increase teachers' decisionmaking
authority in responsibilities that affect their ability to teach.
These procedures may include, but need not be limited to, the
following:
   (1) Selection of new teachers and administrators.
   (2) Evaluation of teacher and administrator performance.
   (3) Selection of curricular areas for improvement.
   (4) Tailoring and coordination of curriculum and instruction
across grade levels and within departments at the schoolsite level.
   (5) Establishment of pupil discipline policies.
   (6) Design and conduct of staff development programs and policies.
   (7) Assignment of pupils and scheduling of classes.
   (8) Schoolwide problem solving and program development.
   (9) Organization of the school for effective instruction.
   (10) Development of procedures designed to institutionalize
teacher involvement in decisionmaking.
   (11) Determining the roles and functions of teachers,
administrators, and classified employees at the school site.
   (12) Development of alternative methods of teacher compensation
that reward teaching excellence, exceptional achievement or the
assumption of additional educational responsibilities.
   (13) Establishment of policies to decentralize district
decisionmaking by providing schoolsite administrators and teachers
with greater budget authority including the allocation of fiscal,
personnel, and other resources at the schoolsite.
   (b) Participation of school discticts in the programs established
pursuant to this article shall be on a voluntary basis.  A school
district shall be eligible to participate only upon the approval of
participation by both the governing board of the district and the
exclusive representative of certificated employees of the district.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
44667.2.  It is the intent of the Legislature that each school
district's school-based management proposal shall include the
following:
   (a) A plan for involving parents in the planning, implementation,
and evaluation of school restructuring efforts.
   (b) A plan for staff development that shall be made available to
participating school personnel in order to assist in restructuring
elements specified in the  district proposal.
   (c) A plan for regularly assessing the progress of participating
schools in meeting the goals identified in their funding proposal.
Assessment plans shall include provisions for the collection of
information on various school-level indicators including pupil
performance, detentions, pupil and teacher absenteeism, and staff
turnover.  Districts are encouraged, as well, to establish a process
of onsite quality reviews with the objective of evaluating the
quality of instruction, leadership, staff development, and the
planning and decisionmaking processes at participating schools.